>>716055446
>which is exactly what you're doing.
Lol, no I'm not, I said I'm into loli, which isn't a problem where I live. Anti-lolifags are the ones who are always the most insecure about this shit which is a basic red flag about your inherent guilt. Again, I have no reason to care, but reminding you morons that you are achieving nothing apart from creating a digital paper trail every time you post about this is at least kind of amusing.
>You're twisting yourself into a pretzel to avoid this undeniable fact.
I actually never denied any of what you're claiming, what I'm denying is that there's any real evidence that lolicon consumers are a threat to real children and pointing out that you faggots never have any proof to back your claims up. Again, do you have anything to back yourself up, or are you just wasting people's time by shitposting? If you don't have anything worth responding to I won't waste my time any further. Good luck with your inevitable court hearing.
