All porn is child porn because you're getting off to skin cells which are a few months old at best

Status?

niggas will tell you it’s a 4D manifold, a metric, a vectorfield or whatever... basically just descriptive abstract math shit. or That it's “nothing” but also “expands.” That it has no substance but can bend, ripple, and carry waves. That light redshifts not because it loses energy, but because “space itself stretches.” Don’t ask what stretches. Don’t ask what it stretches into. dont ask how space is connected.

what a load of barnicles...
Modern physics has no clue what space is. maybe space has mass, maybe space is just baseline potential for mass. the jews dont really know even if they claim they do. yet all of their gay theories are built on shit like spaces and fields which they do not really understand.

Stupid question, but light is "electromagnetic radiation". But what part of light is "electromagnetic"? I heard it's supposed to be fluctuations of the E and B fields but I don't really understand what that's supposed to mean or if that's even right. Does it interact w/ electric and magnetic fields? If I have a really strong current or electric field, can I use it to affect the trajectory of light? I know that electromagnetic interactions are supposed to be mediated by photons but what exactly does that mean?

>tfw too intelligent to function in a society built by imbeciles
Does anyone else here know this feel?

So the benefits of "hybrid vigor" espoused by leftist academia were actually not true.

This is awkward

Replace material with real. Is it real? Then there’s something there to it. That’s material. To say something isn’t material is to say something isn’t real.

Is this economically viable?

4chan says EMP would have destroyed the cellphones so it's fake
Copilot said

That claim is misleading—cellphones can survive a nuclear EMP, especially if they’re not connected to power or shielded by surrounding materials. So footage of a nuclear-like explosion captured on phones is not automatically fake.
Why Cellphones Can Survive an EMP

EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) from a nuclear blast can damage electronics, but the effect depends on:

Altitude of detonation: High-altitude bursts produce widespread EMP; ground-level blasts have more localized effects

.

Distance from the blast: EMP strength drops with distance. A phone several miles away may experience little to no disruption.

Shielding: Phones in pockets, cars, or buildings are partially shielded from EMP effects

.

Not plugged in: Devices connected to power grids are more vulnerable. A phone running on battery is less likely to be damaged

.

Real-World Testing

A 2022 study by SEMPRE and Jaxon Engineering found that commercial smartphones like the iPhone 12 and Galaxy S21 Ultra survived EMP testing

.

These tests suggest that modern phones have some resilience, especially when not exposed directly or when shielded.

Why 4chan Might Say It’s Fake

Trolling culture: 4chan often spreads misinformation or oversimplified “debunkings” to stir debate.

Gatekeeping: Dismissing footage as fake based on flawed logic is a way to control narratives or mock outsiders.

Misunderstanding EMP physics: Many assume EMP is an instant, universal electronics killer—this is a Hollywood myth, not scientific reality

.

Bottom Line

Footage of a massive explosion, even one resembling a nuclear blast, can be real and captured on cellphones. The presence of video doesn’t disprove the event—it just means the conditions weren’t sufficient to fry nearby electronics.

Escapade - edition

previous >>16837796

Why can't this be made?

A function maps one input to one output... but why don't we make this bi-directional? A function must map an output to exactly one input.

[math]f(X) = f(Y) \iff X = Y[/math]

This seems like it would make it much easier to reason about things if outputs are unique.

you were saying?

>>>/b/942166092

theoretical basis of electrogravitic propulsion just dropped

ITT: Post elegant and intuitive ways of visualizing/understanding subject matter. I'll start off with a few.

Why do people like cigarettes? They taste like fucking death, give you cancer and make you smell like shit. All they do is make you feel lightheaded for like 10 minutes, and then you have to have another one.

Naturebros… I think we lost. There is just too much evidence that nurture is true. I think we should throw in the towel at this point. Good genes mean nothing without the proper upbringing.

Why have Harvard students gotten so much smarter over the past 50 years?

Is the conjugate wave in an optical phase conjugation rig actually going back in time? I've read some things by otherwise reputable people that indicate that there is indeed some sort of actual time reversal going on, and not just "how the math works out, but not a real effect". It also seems like a lot of these "anomalously dispersive materials" that support phase conjugation also produce other weird effects (looking at you Bose-Einstein and Fermionic Condensates) like superluminal propagation through the medium.

What do you think is the hardest step to intelligent life? (assuming the previous step was complete for 2 and 3)
1. Abiogenesis
2. Complex multicellular life
3. Intelligent life and civilization

why did scientists in the 19th century believe interstellar space was full of ether? why is this random organic compound supposed to be in space?

African invention

Materialist cucks when asked, where is the physical location of an ant colony collective hivemind brain, goes on a schizo rant about each ant being a part of such intelligence, even thought it can't be proven that the ant colony hivemind ever resides on each ant nervous system.

But, but, but, the ant hivemind is an emergent property of the brains of each brain they will reply, even thought there's not evidence when looking at a single ant brain that the location of things like the hivemind memories or decisions even physically exist in the network of ants.

how the FUCK did Einstein figure out that c is equal in all inertial frames sitting in an office with a pad and pencil? and better yet, what is the actual explanation for why this is? it makes no fucking logical sense whatsoever to my brainlet mind and goes against the entire framework of all physics up to that point. I understand that its true because mathematically it makes predictions we confirm to be correct, but WHY and HOW did this nigga realize it just goofing off? bonus question: what is the actual relationship between space and time explained in a way a retard can digest?

How does AI deal with contradictions?

Explain to me what is the maxwell demon.

Does it means we live like in a digital reality?

Are there true contradictions?

was he really that smart?

AI is not good enough to implement complex projects on its own. But it follows instructions and implements smaller tasks better than junior developers.

1 senior developer + 9 junior developers = 1 senior developer + AI

That's why big tech is firing EVERYONE.

>muh causes
>muh effects
>muh causality
You realize this is pure head canon, right? You can't demonstrate that something "makes" something else happen. You can't even explain what it means for anything to "cause" something. All you can do is observe a recurring sequence of events and fill the logical gaps between them with this mysterious "causality".

Consider how differently a murderer, a pathologist and a cellular biologist see a victim's cause of death: for one, the death was caused by stabbing the victim in the neck; for the other it was caused by a ruptured carotid artery; for the last, it was maybe some cascade of necrotic cellular processes. Each one will treat his "X causes Y" just-so story as an adequate and objective explanation, oblivious or indifferent to its failure to completely rule out other conceivable outcomes.

No matter how much you drill down, the logical gap between your causes and their supposed effects never goes away. You can never logically demonstrate that the effect follows from the cause the way a conclusion follows from a premise, except by way of extra premises that are circular or defeasible.

There is no possible way that China's population is as big as they claim it is. In 1979 China instituted the "1 child policy" which set their birth rate to a maximum of 40% of replacement level and at that time China's population was 960 million according to the CCP, which was also doubtful since the country's population was supposedly 500 million in 1950 when the CCP took over and subsequently they suffered "The great famine" for 3 years in which 100 million died, so the 960 million figure in 1979 also seems like a probable overstatement, but even if it were true, the one-child policy would've meant a decline in population following 1979. Furthermore the country has seen practically no immigration while millions have fled China.
So there is no possible way their population swelled to the over 1.4 billion the currently claim.

Can /sci/ estimate what China's current population really is?

RIP king, they did you dirty

Higher Dimensions Solve Dark Matter? Modified Einstein Equation Explains Flat Galaxy Rotation Curves Without Invisible Mass Equation & Deets Inside

Why can't we just clone this thing?

it's over everything is fucked edition

Previous Thread: >>>16792899

This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
>If you have a question, before posting, read some of the older posts and ,if you can, try to answer their questions on your post. That way the thread isn't an endless log of unanswered questions.

Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)

Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.

No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/

An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454

plants evolved from first multicellular animals, thats why both are multicellular

fungi did this too

multicellularity began only once

this also explains why all three have so similar form:

>primitive cnidarians look like plants
>fungus look like primitive animals altough non moving
>plants resemble the animals the most
>first multicellular animals branch like trees

what went different is that plants have those chloroplasts to use light as a source of energy, this didnt happen in fungi or animals

the chromosomal DNA (not inside mitochondria) was at first the same for animals, plants and fungi, and this DNA is what creates the form, hwich is why all three look like plants

much much later evolution gave a head region to animals (fish, insect) and they became radically different from plants and fungi, in form

PhD David Deutsch says he's as sure many worlds interpretation is correct as he is that evolution is correct. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bux0SjaUCY0

Is he right to be so confident the many worlds interpretation is true?

I mean 400 million years is a long fucking time.

Is there scientific proof that aphantasia exists?

What's the greatest scientific achievement to come out of Africa in the last 100 years?

Easy Difficulty: Literally anything.

Normal Difficulty: No Afrikaners or other ethnically european or asian people.

Hard Difficulty: Normal difficulty plus also educated in Africa.

Earth is about 4.54 billion years old. The average day length has increased over time due to tidal friction. Early Earth rotated much faster, estimated 5 to 6 hours per day.

Using a rough integration of changing day length over geologic time:

~4.5 billion years ago: ~5 h days ~1,752 days per year

Today: 24 h days 365 days per year

Average across history: about 900–1000 days per year

Total rotations ≈ average days/year × years = (≈950) × (4.54 × 109) ≈ 4.3 × 1012 rotations.

How come scientists can’t agree on the definition of entropy? Everyone always answers differently.

I barely even know what string theory is, but I have still made dozens of posts portraying its supporters as onions boys lol
It just seems kinda reddit, you know what I mean
And the posts create a lot of seethe

whats the point of /sci/ if I can just ask questions to chatgpt?

>Science can't explain this but it supposedly knows about what was going on a fraction of a second after the Big Bang

Lmao, you actually believe that?

Don't give out advice, don't reply to the schizofag... unless you're bored.

Why does nobody take Geometric Unity seriously?