>>716057087
>>716058642
LMAO I love it here when the brain-fucked losers here go on about how loli isn't pedophilia nor has any correlation with real children at all, and then you have someone go on a spiel about how "Actually many men/women banged 12 year olds and found them attractive in 1890 so even if loli was pedo(WHICH IT TOTALLY ISN'T) it wouldn't matter since it's not all that abnormal" or be like this
>>716058642
poster who just goes "actually we here on 4chan were always pedos and being a pedo is heckin BASED!". Really harms the other coping defenders' cases that loli isn't pedo nor doesn't attract pedos.