Search Results
7/19/2025, 2:33:23 AM
>>531797152
Correct. Sisters are made for hugging, snugging, loving, and sometimes fugging.
Correct. Sisters are made for hugging, snugging, loving, and sometimes fugging.
7/16/2025, 10:18:49 AM
>>531428120
Fuck yeah dude, sisterhugs rock.
Fuck yeah dude, sisterhugs rock.
7/14/2025, 1:55:24 AM
>>531120621
Little Rizzter. Charismouto, if you will.
Little Rizzter. Charismouto, if you will.
7/8/2025, 5:22:05 AM
7/7/2025, 11:47:24 PM
>>530341920
>Why would a guy who mutilated his parents as a daytime chore be genuinely oh so disgusting by incest anyway?
It shocked him. It's something Ashley had, by his own admission, never said up until that point. Saying he's "disgusted" by it is a complete mischaracterization of the situation, anybody who has played the game knows that Andrew's feelings for Ashley are far, far, FAR more complicated than Ashley's feelings are for him. Andrew's warped desire for her was in direct conflict with his normie façade (copedrew) along with his pseudo-parental role, it was a massive source of internal conflict, and being reminded of the reality of the situation immediately flips the switch from a moment of passion because it's a splash of cold water down the pants. It actually bothers me how both sides of the argument seem completely oblivious to his situation, I feel like this shit is very obvious if you pay attention even a little bit.
>Why would a guy who mutilated his parents as a daytime chore be genuinely oh so disgusting by incest anyway?
It shocked him. It's something Ashley had, by his own admission, never said up until that point. Saying he's "disgusted" by it is a complete mischaracterization of the situation, anybody who has played the game knows that Andrew's feelings for Ashley are far, far, FAR more complicated than Ashley's feelings are for him. Andrew's warped desire for her was in direct conflict with his normie façade (copedrew) along with his pseudo-parental role, it was a massive source of internal conflict, and being reminded of the reality of the situation immediately flips the switch from a moment of passion because it's a splash of cold water down the pants. It actually bothers me how both sides of the argument seem completely oblivious to his situation, I feel like this shit is very obvious if you pay attention even a little bit.
7/6/2025, 9:30:59 PM
>>530196153
Very good post. The incest aspect is vilified among a crowd which is normally, for the sake of not kicking up a shitstorm, we'll say "libertine" because it's tender and human. Everything about the modern zeitgeist is about dehumanizing the human experience. The mystique and eroticism of titillation and sex have been supplanted by obscene transparency and reduced to an act of self-gratification involving another person. Murder? The people they kill aren't "humans," they're scarecrows. Cannibalism? Whatever, blood, gore, and acts of horrific violence simply exist in your daily life thanks to social media and Hollywood. Domestic abuse? Ashley represents the antithesis of modernity, honestly she deserves it. Mind you, I don't actually believe any of these things, I'm just explaining the apparent doublethink. But yes, the incest is what offends them because it's procreative sex between two people who don't just love each other, they literally cannot survive without the other. They're not good people, they have good parts, they have bad parts, they have hopes and dreams and delusions and primal monkey urges. They're humans engaging in a very human and wholesome—comparatively—love devoid of guile or irony.
Very good post. The incest aspect is vilified among a crowd which is normally, for the sake of not kicking up a shitstorm, we'll say "libertine" because it's tender and human. Everything about the modern zeitgeist is about dehumanizing the human experience. The mystique and eroticism of titillation and sex have been supplanted by obscene transparency and reduced to an act of self-gratification involving another person. Murder? The people they kill aren't "humans," they're scarecrows. Cannibalism? Whatever, blood, gore, and acts of horrific violence simply exist in your daily life thanks to social media and Hollywood. Domestic abuse? Ashley represents the antithesis of modernity, honestly she deserves it. Mind you, I don't actually believe any of these things, I'm just explaining the apparent doublethink. But yes, the incest is what offends them because it's procreative sex between two people who don't just love each other, they literally cannot survive without the other. They're not good people, they have good parts, they have bad parts, they have hopes and dreams and delusions and primal monkey urges. They're humans engaging in a very human and wholesome—comparatively—love devoid of guile or irony.
7/2/2025, 9:54:06 PM
7/1/2025, 9:11:08 PM
A nation is its people. Coffinland is Coffinland because it's filled with Coffinnish people who established it after the Coffinno-Korean Hyperwar. Arguing semantics about who qualifies as Coffinnish and who doesn't is asinine because everyone intrinsically understands what a Coffinnish person is and everyone else is playing dumb on purpose because they want to muddy the waters and undermine the Coffinnish people.
6/28/2025, 12:03:14 PM
>>529127989
You just have to platonically kiss your sister on the back of the neck while she's reading, and then proceed—in a very non-sexual fashion—to run your hands over her body. If she starts making noises of appreciation then you know you're being a good big brother. A fantastic big brother, on the other hand, would take it one step further and platonically make passionate love to her sisterly body until she's shaking and then go in with intent on round 2. Platonically, that is.
You just have to platonically kiss your sister on the back of the neck while she's reading, and then proceed—in a very non-sexual fashion—to run your hands over her body. If she starts making noises of appreciation then you know you're being a good big brother. A fantastic big brother, on the other hand, would take it one step further and platonically make passionate love to her sisterly body until she's shaking and then go in with intent on round 2. Platonically, that is.
6/22/2025, 4:45:54 PM
>>528400006
>Josh
One does not speak of my nigga, Jesus, so casually. Either way love that guy like you wouldn't believe, literally let himself be tortured and crucified to bring salvation to all of humanity instead of a "chosen few."
>Josh
One does not speak of my nigga, Jesus, so casually. Either way love that guy like you wouldn't believe, literally let himself be tortured and crucified to bring salvation to all of humanity instead of a "chosen few."
6/21/2025, 3:47:48 AM
>>528222628
>I'll talk to her tomorrow since I'm tired as shit right now
Completely reasonable.
>And by then this'll have probably worn off since we are fated to do this dance forever
You will always remember this as a day your sister was super cute!
>I'll talk to her tomorrow since I'm tired as shit right now
Completely reasonable.
>And by then this'll have probably worn off since we are fated to do this dance forever
You will always remember this as a day your sister was super cute!
6/20/2025, 4:10:47 AM
>>528092014
I like things that make me feel happy. There, I fucking said it.
I like things that make me feel happy. There, I fucking said it.
6/18/2025, 3:51:44 AM
>>527833334
No. A common misconception but Jesus specifically discarded the old covenants. Hebrews 8:13.
No. A common misconception but Jesus specifically discarded the old covenants. Hebrews 8:13.
6/17/2025, 2:18:33 AM
>>527700803
There's literally nothing wrong with giving your sister a full-body massage, it doesn't always have to lead to adult situations which means there's no inherent moral hazard and your sister's sore muscles will thank you for it.
There's literally nothing wrong with giving your sister a full-body massage, it doesn't always have to lead to adult situations which means there's no inherent moral hazard and your sister's sore muscles will thank you for it.
6/15/2025, 11:30:48 PM
>>527562359
If sisters weren't made for snuggling, they wouldn't be so snuggly.
If sisters weren't made for snuggling, they wouldn't be so snuggly.
6/14/2025, 4:58:27 PM
>>527402469
>exactly my point all along
No, your point was that long-term inbreeding is universally bad. The fact of the matter is that de novo mutations, as far as current screening technology is concerned, completely unpredictable in naturally conceived children. The idea that long-term inbreeding CAN lock in harmful mutations is predicated on the following:
>A mutation occurs
>The mutation is notably deleterious
>The mutation successfully passes from one parent to both children
Any given gene must be present in BOTH parents for incest to affect its propagation, if it's only present in one parent then incest is a non-factor for that particular gene. I don't think you grasp the mathematical odds at play here, but to drive another point home: de novo mutations can actually cause desirable effects as well, and are theorized to be one of the driving forces of the theory of evolution. They can also have no effect whatsoever. Ultimately, the actual risk of long-term inbreeding is incalculable because of this randomness and is only discouraged from a scientific perspective based on the fact that inbreeding CAN propagate undesirable effects while ignoring the fact that both parents would have to be defective for it to matter in the first place. Basically, "it's bad because it just is, okay?"
>exactly my point all along
No, your point was that long-term inbreeding is universally bad. The fact of the matter is that de novo mutations, as far as current screening technology is concerned, completely unpredictable in naturally conceived children. The idea that long-term inbreeding CAN lock in harmful mutations is predicated on the following:
>A mutation occurs
>The mutation is notably deleterious
>The mutation successfully passes from one parent to both children
Any given gene must be present in BOTH parents for incest to affect its propagation, if it's only present in one parent then incest is a non-factor for that particular gene. I don't think you grasp the mathematical odds at play here, but to drive another point home: de novo mutations can actually cause desirable effects as well, and are theorized to be one of the driving forces of the theory of evolution. They can also have no effect whatsoever. Ultimately, the actual risk of long-term inbreeding is incalculable because of this randomness and is only discouraged from a scientific perspective based on the fact that inbreeding CAN propagate undesirable effects while ignoring the fact that both parents would have to be defective for it to matter in the first place. Basically, "it's bad because it just is, okay?"
6/12/2025, 6:53:32 PM
>>527172103
Have you considered that sisters are just cute?
Have you considered that sisters are just cute?
6/12/2025, 5:21:30 AM
>>527111680
Sisters? Super cute.
Sisters? Super cute.
Page 1