>>715947993
>when he debated anyone and everyone, it's what he's good at
He's a shit debater. Rapidly reading off wikipedia articles when he doesn't actually understand what they mean or are saying, throwing out dozens of "points" hoping one sticks, and Motte-and-bailey his arguments and constantly having to retreat is not being good at debate. He is probably the worst of the "debater" breadtubers, and that is saying something considering his competition. You faggots who fall for gish gallopers like Destiny and think that is "good debate" are such fucking midwits.