>>33304369
>who the Bible commands must be married but they teach the exact opposite because they don't care what the Bible says.
Paul, the writer of letters to the Corinthians, in which this is expressed, also remained unmarried and expressed positive attitude towards celibacy, also, read Matthew 19:11-12.
Even in these cases, it's not a doctrine nor a dogma, but just a practice.
>and they were making a large profit from their indulgences too.
The sale of indulgences was banned in the Council of Trent lil bro. Also, presumption does not mean conviction, you are not supposed to expect salvation, as you are condemned to the life of repentance and serving the Lord, read Matthew 7:21-23 - not everyone who encounters Jesus will believe in him, and even so, not everyone who does believe in him will do the will of the Father.
>The Bible says if you're saved, you have no need that any man teach you since you're anointed, indwelt, and sealed with the holy Spirit of God unto the day of redemption; and Jesus taught you'd be guided into all truth by him.
Only assuming you have a definitive guarantee of salvation, as teaching is emphasized in Romans 12:6-7. Only God can judge you and proclaim if you are saved. It makes no logical sense as a sinner who keeps erring in his life could claim salvation becuase he believes in Jesus refer to this in Galatians 6:7-9.
Also wrong, since each member of the laity can dispute the doctrine of the church, and bring the issues under the light. The problem occurs when the dogmas established to be biblical, traditional and under supervision of the magisterium (ecumenical councils, early church fathers, disciples of Christ) contraidct what the person claims, in which case heresy occurs if the persist in false teachings. Even classical protestants agree that excommunication is justified in the vast majority of cases for this reason, difference being the claim that specific cases like for Calvin or Luther was unjustified.
