>>33552396
I won't read threads whose first couple of lines and overall wall-of-textness tell me they are tedious blogs. This is an advice board.

>>33541010
>be me
No. I won't read "be me" green tsunami of stream-of-consciousness autobiography because they are invariably posted by disorganized thinkers with weak to non-existent agency who cannot be helped.

>>33538591
I won't read wall-of-text going nowhere threads. Get to the point next time.

>>33518961
I won't read drunkard threads, and most certainly I won't read wall-of-text.

>>33488573
I wont' read wall-of-text autobiographies. Get to the point next time.

>>33489753
I won't read green wall-of-text streaming autobiographies. Get to the point next time.

>>33476257
>gioyc escapee
I won't read wall of text hypotheticals that are actually just one long whinge.

>>33473817
I won't read multi-mega-wall-of-text laundry list of woes threads. Get to the point next time.

>>33467859
I won't read extremely convoluted, excuse-making and boring wall-of-text threads.

>>33451368
I won't read be me tsunami of green vomit wall of text stream of consciousness. Get to the point next time because we haven't got all day and you're disrespectful of the reader's time.

>>33449478
Too much preamble, so I won't read it. Get to the point next time.

>>33392407
I won't read yet another numerology followed by wall-of-text where the fuck is the question thread. Get to the point next time.

>>33380326
I'm won't read a wall of text, unsolicited blog on an advice board.

>>33378299
I won't read yet another daunting wall of text that starts in prehistory and you know you're in for an interminable saga before maybe, just maybe it finally asks for advice (or not).

>>33369768
>There's so much wrong with me,
>[wall of text]
I won't read laundry list of woes. The OP doesn't have the good manners to concisely state one problem for readers to help him with but instead just does a diarretic gusher dump of eeeeverything he was ever bothered about. That tells you that he can't be helped at all, because he's going to nitpick, shoot down or ignore anything suggested (remember, he has no manners, no consideration whatsoever for those wanting to help). There is nothing that can be done.

>>33364020
>>be me
No! I won't read stream of consciousness, blow-by-blow monologs. State your problem up front next time.

>>33354419
I won't read essays on an advice board.

>>33342248
I won't read autobiographies on an advice board. Get to the point next time.

>>33308254
>green wall of text
I won't read it.

>>33276991
I won't read your wall of text autobiography and meandering stream of thoughts. Get to the point next time.

>>33275478
I won't read yet another be me here we go again green blow by blow wall of text saga. Get to the point next time..

>>33269589
I won^t read your wall of text. get to the point next time.

>>33265358
When an opinion reaches five lines it is no longer a fortune cookie or even an aphorism since those are pithy observations about the future and life, respectively. Instead, what we have here is a stunted wall-of-text.

>>33262316
I won't read wall-of-text threads. Get to the point next time.

>>33259524
I won't read wall-of-text autobiographies. Get to the point next time.

>>33251901
I won't read this wall-of-text mumbling over nothing.

>>33242855
I won't read wall-of-text tsunami of convoluted made-up nothing problem. Come back when you have a real problem.

>>33238692
>(1/2)
I won't read multi-part sagas. Get to the point next time.

>>33238544
I won't read your autobiography. Get to the point next time.

>>33229215
I won't read textual-tsunami, life story threads.

>>33218124
I won't read wall of text autobiographies on an advice board. Get to the point next time.