>>281189425
>But is means it's better than a normal anime.
Why? If it tries something avant-garde and fails horribly, then it just downgraded itself. The story is strong, it deserves proper execution.
Experimentation for experimentation's sake is idiotic, it needs to have purpose. Thinking that it's good is literal first-year liberal arts student behavior.
Not really related, but I do agree about the "practical effects", they're awesome. Practical effects isn't the right word but I know what you're getting at. It's really only the simulcast sequence that I have problems with.