>>212904905
My issue is it is made by the same cinematographer who made and filmed Flash and looks like it. Just an ugly movie.

>>212594706
>363 million
No way, it looks like a fucking TV movie. Where did the money go? Also, is this with or without marketing, because that is always another 100 million

>Gunnjeet army defending their ugly Bollywood slop
oof

>>212537673
Like this one?

>>212506206
Is the CGI better than they made it look in the trailer?

>>212492609
yep looks like total shit, not gonna be gaslit

>>212489360
How can a modern movie have CGI this bad?

>>212470151
So making the movie shit, that was part of the plan.

AHHH FUUUUUGGG WHY DOES OUR BILLION DOLLAR MOVIE LOOK LIKE INDIAN TIKTOK AHHHH WTFFF

We finally have an actual Bollywood inspired superhero movie and you're laughing??!

>>149305118
>I mean from everything we've seen this movie looks good.
C'mon, now. Why lie?

>>149299777
movie already flopped. Nobody is going to see this. I'll stick with Kinosaurs.

>>212448365
Saars, not like that please not

>>212447063
Total flop incoming

>>212432210
vfx from mumbai...

>>212431702
No one is going to see this

>>212427304
>>212427393
>>212427402

>>212414252
>>212418663

>>212418742
Superjew shills are getting desperate

> This destroys the Gunnjeet cope
2 ez

>>212416983
nope, Gunnjeets have been shilling this movie, but can't because the film can't stand on its own merit and need to be compared to Snyder constantly.

>>280292870
Just go watch the new superman movie

In what way does this ugly shit look kino?

>>212349987
This, I can take shit like CGI capes but why this door needs to be CGI too? They need to stop releasing those clips each new one is worse

>>280190508
Tell that to Kal-El's snapped pelvis

>>212273510
>hires The Flash cinematographer
>gets The Flash box office
Wow what a surprise

>>212207911
nta but it does looks a bit worse. The saturated colors, the autistic acting, the lack of anything interesting at all... The MCU was always mid and the DCU a mess, but this looks like some AI generated slop that will please no one.

>>212006145
>Does Superman usually sperg out as much in the comics as I've seen in these little marketing clips?
No and that's really concerning. I already saw Snyderman as some edgy emo version of Super and this is looking worse despite the bright filter.

>>211808461
>Suit’s solid, clean visuals, decent cinematography. Definitely feels like a step up from the cheap green screen soap opera look superhero flicks keep slipping into
C'mon, why lie. Yes Snyderverse was shit but this is not looking any better.

>>211778538
Both look so bad, I can't believe Gunn hired the same guy after Flash flopped

>>211778585
It does and I am the one guy who downloaded the camrip of MoS in spanish and posted a shitton of webms back in the day to proove to early Snyderfags how bad the movie was. I hated MoS but Gunn's movie is looking just as bad just on the other side of the spectrum, we traded a dark edgy movie for a colorful slapstick one.

>>211646448
>filmed for IMAX
Hate IMAX honestly but even hacks like Nolan at least can give you a great scene or two, imagine webm related on IMAX

>>149049184
>is he stupid
Have you seen his movies? Have you seen the trailer for the new Superman? Webm related is real, it's the final product, he hired the same guy from The Flash to do the photography and CGI.

Yes, he is very stupid.

>>149049184
>is he stupid
Have you seen his movies? Have you seen the trailer for the new Superman? Webm related is real, it's the final product, he hired the same guy from The Flash to do the photography and CGI.

Yes, he is very stupid.

>>211544250
In this case he might have been honest since he hired the weirdo who did the cinematography in The Flash to work in Superman

>>211468722