>>82784471
scale is inaccurate, here's the canon one
>younger than 14
you're probably poor and/or nonwhite
>14-15
you're probably just high T and/or attractive
>16-17
was normal in the 2000s, but this is slightly early in currentyear. You're probably not ugly or socially retarded
>18-19
current average, you have normal levels of social retardation
>20-22
this is the second to last train. If you haven't lost it by the time you're out of college, then you have serious social issues. Chances of ever losing it are low at this point, but it's still doable if you try really hard
>23-25
legitimately the last train. If you haven't had sex by the time your brain is fully developed, your chances of doing so without seeing a whore are negligible. They'll continue to decrease exponentially over time, but it's the difference between .00001% and .000000001%. Both are basically zero