>>509303237
Considering how beneficial the event was for the government, and certain debatable third parties, at least in potential, it's plausible. In the end a lot blew back on them, but depending on the ultimate effects of the vaccine and how valuable all the information they've collected from and since the event, it might even have still been worth it. It all being on China seems pretty absurd, and it's such a joke that a poorly maintained lab in a quasicommunist dictatorship was funded by open society globalists and the American NIH directly to do retarded accelerated mutation experiments on highly transmissible viruses, which are more likely to harm China in the event of a leak than anyone else. How does any of that make sense?
