>>40582461
reposting cuz 'off topic' ban (kek)
look the first problem with AI is that if they expose falsehoods in academically accepted conceptualizations about meaning, the AI will side with OPINIONS because it’s programmed to not allow challenging academically imposed conceptual limitations…or theocratic ones. they start yapping semirelated things about the topic, and either give misleading information or act overly agreeable
you have to compare different AI tools so you can recognize synthetic barriers. there are efforts at discreet nationalized control of AI conceptual limitations and dogmatic boundaries. so use the resources while you can and compare outputs regularly.
and then theres this false dichotomy that's embedded itself into modern scientism. the western world seemed to agree that science and spirituality are separate realms. In the meanwhile, you can see that the CIA has been involved in Operation Stargate, exploring astral projection, remote viewing, and all these psi abilities since at least the 70s
>uh oh umm what makes you say things like that??
I have a whole data set built from publically available classified reports, anecdotal data, or extrapolation from unexplained observations
through critical analysis, crossreferencing sources, and acknowledging biases, I'm trying to approximate a more reliable understanding of what's going on. building an overarching meta narrative
the mechanistic reductionist science rant will continue hold up
